Harris v. State
345 S.W.3d 875, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2011 WL 3047621
Opinion
ORDER
Roy Harris appeals from the motion court’s denial of his request to re-open his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings. On appeal, Harris maintains that he should have been allowed to re-open his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings because he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 345 S.W.3d 875, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2011 WL 3047621 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
345 S.W.3d 875 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
CIMA v. Fansler
345 S.W.3d 875 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)