Harris v. State
345 S.W.3d 875, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2011 WL 3047621
This text of 345 S.W.3d 875 (Harris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harris v. State, 345 S.W.3d 875, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2011 WL 3047621 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
Roy Harris appeals from the motion court’s denial of his request to re-open his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings. On appeal, Harris maintains that he should have been allowed to re-open his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings because he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
CIMA v. Fansler
345 S.W.3d 875 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
345 S.W.3d 875, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 984, 2011 WL 3047621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-state-moctapp-2011.