Matteson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Matteson v. State

291 S.W.3d 378, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2009 WL 2750975

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 1, 2009

DocketED 92104

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 S.W.3d 378 (Matteson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matteson v. State, 291 S.W.3d 378, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2009 WL 2750975 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Matteson (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren County denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI