Matteson v. State

291 S.W.3d 378, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2009 WL 2750975
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 2009·No. ED 92104·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Matteson (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren County denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matteson v. State, 291 S.W.3d 378, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1227, 2009 WL 2750975 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

291 S.W.3d 378 (Matteson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
291 S.W.3d 378 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)