Harris v. State
946 S.W.2d 768, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 1997 WL 306694
Opinion
ORDER
Cheryl Lynn Harris (Movant) appeals from the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential
[769]*769value. The judgment is affirmed in aecor-dance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harris v. State, 946 S.W.2d 768, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 1997 WL 306694 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
946 S.W.2d 768 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.