Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. State

879 S.W.2d 800, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 1994 WL 387385

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 1994·No. No. 65240·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Harris v. State, 879 S.W.2d 800, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 1994 WL 387385 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

879 S.W.2d 800 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.