Harris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harris v. State

939 S.W.2d 58, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 312, 1997 WL 90934

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1997·No. No. 71015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Harris v. State, 939 S.W.2d 58, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 312, 1997 WL 90934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

939 S.W.2d 58 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.