Harris v. State

918 So. 2d 450, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 705, 2006 WL 167961
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 845 So. 2d 329
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2006·No. No. 4D05-4291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm an order denjdng Appellant’s motion for post-eonviction relief filed under Florida Rule of.Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court correctly recognized Appellant’s motion did not include a proper oath. State v. Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1993). We remand, however, with leave to re-file the motion with the proper oath. Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579 (Fla. 2004); Ferrell v. State, 825 So.2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

STONE, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harris v. State, 918 So. 2d 450, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 705, 2006 WL 167961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

918 So. 2d 450 (Harris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shearer
628 So. 2d 1102 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Nelson v. State
875 So. 2d 579 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Ferrell v. State
825 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)