Harrell v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harrell v. Southern Railway Co.

79 S.E. 240, 13 Ga. App. 409, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 177

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 9, 1913

Docket4967

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 79 S.E. 240 (Harrell v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrell v. Southern Railway Co., 79 S.E. 240, 13 Ga. App. 409, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

Where a petition is demurred to both generally and specially, and some of the grounds of the special demurrer are sustained as to certain items of damage claimed in the petition, and the allegations in reference thereto ordered stricken, and the general demurrer is overruled, and the petition is left to be tried upon the allegations not stricken, a bill of exceptions sued out to the Court of Appeals, assigning error upon the sustaining of the special demurrer, is premature. The judgment complained of is not a final judgment, nor would it have been final if it had been rendered as claimed by the excepting party. Civil Code, § 6138; Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley, 4 Ga. App. 60 (60 S. E. 808); Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler, 11 Ga. App. 273 (75 S. E. 142). Writ of error dismissed.

Action for damages; from city court of Eastman — Judge Neese. April 18, 1913. •

James F. Broach, O. J. Franlclin, for plaintiff. Eschol Graham, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

Where a petition is demurred to both generally and specially, and some of the grounds of the special demurrer are sustained as to certain items of damage claimed in the petition, and the allegations in reference thereto ordered stricken, and the general demurrer is overruled, and the petition is left to be tried upon the allegations not stricken, a bill of exceptions sued out to the Court of Appeals, assigning error upon the sustaining of the special demurrer, is premature. The judgment complained of is not a final judgment, nor would it have been final if it had been rendered as claimed by the excepting party. Civil Code, § 6138; Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley, 4 Ga. App. 60 (60 S. E. 808); Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler, 11 Ga. App. 273 (75 S. E. 142). Writ of error dismissed.

Action for damages; from city court of Eastman — Judge Neese. April 18, 1913. •

James F. Broach, O. J. Franlclin, for plaintiff. Eschol Graham, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.E. 240, 13 Ga. App. 409, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack