Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley

Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley

60 S.E. 808, 4 Ga. App. 60, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 200
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 16, 1908
Docket968
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 60 S.E. 808 (Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartman Stock Farm v. Henley, 60 S.E. 808, 4 Ga. App. 60, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 200 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Russell, J.

A writ of error sued out to a judgment overruling a demurrer, where a judgment sustaining the demurrer would not be a final determination in the case, is prematurely brought and must be dismissed. But the bill of exceptions having been presented and certified within the time allowed by law for the filing of exceptions pendente lite, the dismissal is ordered with direction that the bill of exceptions operate as exceptions pendente lite in the cause in the lower court.

Writ of error dismissed, with direction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Collins
159 S.E.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Mayor and Council of Alamo v. Smith
16 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Harrell v. Southern Railway Co.
79 S.E. 240 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Finley v. Southern Railway Co.
64 S.E. 312 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 S.E. 808, 4 Ga. App. 60, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartman-stock-farm-v-henley-gactapp-1908.