Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler

75 S.E. 142, 11 Ga. App. 273, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 368

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 2, 1912

Docket3608

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 75 S.E. 142 (Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler, 75 S.E. 142, 11 Ga. App. 273, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 368 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The bill of exceptions disclosing that no final judgment was rendered in the ease, and the only assignment of error being as to the . judgment overruling a motion to strike certain portions of the answer, the writ of error was prematurely sued out, and this court is without jurisdiction. Simmons v. Peagler, 7 Ga. App. 252 (66 S. E. 629), and citations.

2. Leave, however, is granted to the plaintiff in error to have the official copy of the bill of exceptions, of file in the office of the clerk of the city court of Savannah, recorded therein as an exception pendente lite.

Writ of error dismissed, with direction.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI