Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler

75 S.E. 142, 11 Ga. App. 273, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 368
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 2, 1912·No. 3608·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The bill of exceptions disclosing that no final judgment was rendered in the ease, and the only assignment of error being as to the . judgment overruling a motion to strike certain portions of the answer, the writ of error was prematurely sued out, and this court is without jurisdiction. Simmons v. Peagler, 7 Ga. App. 252 (66 S. E. 629), and citations.

2. Leave, however, is granted to the plaintiff in error to have the official copy of the bill of exceptions, of file in the office of the clerk of the city court of Savannah, recorded therein as an exception pendente lite.

Writ of error dismissed, with direction.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler, 75 S.E. 142, 11 Ga. App. 273, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 368 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

75 S.E. 142 (Neal-Blun Co. v. Zeigler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayor and Council of Alamo v. Smith
16 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Overstreet v. Patterson
187 S.E. 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Bush v. Kent
180 S.E. 858 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Reagin v. Stroud
180 S.E. 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Head v. Jordan
125 S.E. 733 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Carpenter v. First National Bank
79 S.E. 360 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Harrell v. Southern Railway Co.
79 S.E. 240 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)