Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co.

721 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1999 WL 2514
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1730
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 721 So. 2d 1266 (Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co., 721 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1999 WL 2514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a non-final order granting Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to compel and/or abate proceedings with respect to a Hurricane Andrew property damage claim. Based on the valid enforceable appraisal provision in the parties’ agreement, the order under review is reversed. The trial court is directed to enter an order compelling appraisal. As the insurer concedes, Martinez v. Allstate Ins, Co., 718 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), Llaguno v. ARI Mutual Ins. Co., 719 So.2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So.2d 691, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) control.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galindo v. Ari Mutual Insurance Co.
203 F.3d 771 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Romay
744 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
721 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1999 WL 2514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrah-v-allstate-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1999.