Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co.

721 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1999 WL 2514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 1999·No. No. 98-1730·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a non-final order granting Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to compel and/or abate proceedings with respect to a Hurricane Andrew property damage claim. Based on the valid enforceable appraisal provision in the parties’ agreement, the order under review is reversed. The trial court is directed to enter an order compelling appraisal. As the insurer concedes, Martinez v. Allstate Ins, Co., 718 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), Llaguno v. ARI Mutual Ins. Co., 719 So.2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So.2d 691, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) control.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co., 721 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 56, 1999 WL 2514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

721 So. 2d 1266 (Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Galindo v. Ari Mutual Insurance Co.
203 F.3d 771 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Romay
744 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)