Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co.

718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12411, 1998 WL 670336
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 1998
DocketNo. 98-1061
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 718 So. 2d 368 (Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co., 718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12411, 1998 WL 670336 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As in Llaguno v. ARI Mutual Ins. Co., 719 So.2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) and Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So.2d 591, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), “[u]pon the sole condition that the insured[s] file [a] sworn proof of loss required by the policy in support of ... [their] claim for additional insured damages, the order below denying appraisal is reversed on the authority of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sierra, 705 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and the cause is remanded with directions to order appraisal.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chimerakis v. Sentry Ins. Mut. Co.
804 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co.
721 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12411, 1998 WL 670336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martinez-v-allstate-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1998.