Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co.
718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12411, 1998 WL 670336
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1998·No. No. 98-1061·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
As in Llaguno v. ARI Mutual Ins. Co., 719 So.2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) and Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So.2d 591, 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), “[u]pon the sole condition that the insured[s] file [a] sworn proof of loss required by the policy in support of ... [their] claim for additional insured damages, the order below denying appraisal is reversed on the authority of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sierra, 705 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and the cause is remanded with directions to order appraisal.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co., 718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12411, 1998 WL 670336 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
718 So. 2d 368 (Martinez v. Allstate Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chimerakis v. Sentry Ins. Mut. Co.
804 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Harrah v. Allstate Insurance Co.
721 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)