Harr v. State
144 N.E.2d 529, 237 Ind. 320, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 277
Opinions
It appears from the papers filed herein that appellant is attempting, pro se, to submit an appeal to this court. He has, however, failed to file an assignment of errors and otherwise comply with Eule 2-6 of this court, 1954 Edition. Without a proper assignment of errors no jurisdiction is conferred upon this court and the attempted appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Davis v. Pelley (1952), 230 Ind. 248, 251, 102 N. E. 2d 910.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harr v. State, 144 N.E.2d 529, 237 Ind. 320, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 277 (Ind. 1957).
144 N.E.2d 529 (Harr v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hogan v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services
635 N.E.2d 172 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)
White v. State
231 N.E.2d 23 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1967)
Darlington v. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance
221 N.E.2d 188 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1966)
McCrary v. State
173 N.E.2d 300 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1961)
Miles v. State
171 N.E.2d 827 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1961)
Edwards v. State
164 N.E.2d 830 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1960)
Cook v. State
157 N.E.2d 287 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)
Posey v. Murray
148 N.E.2d 426 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)
Harr v. State
144 N.E.2d 529 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Watson v. Watson
144 N.E.2d 529 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1957)