Harper v. State

529 So. 2d 731, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1483, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2606, 1988 WL 62661
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 532 So. 2d 1091
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1988·No. No. 87-1740·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s recommended guideline sentence was “community control or 12-30 months’ incarceration.” The sentence pronounced and imposed was commitment to prison “for a term of five (5) years, suspend 42 months — followed by a period of 42 months on probation....” No reasons were given to support a departure sentence. The issue is whether this is a departure sentence.

The issue in this case is the same as in McKee v. State, 528 So.2d 417 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) and Carr v. State, 528 So.2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), and, on the authority of those cases, the sentence in this case is held not to depart from the guideline recommendation and is

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and DANIEL, JJ., concur. COWART, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. State, 529 So. 2d 731, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1483, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2606, 1988 WL 62661 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

529 So. 2d 731 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carr v. State
528 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
McKee v. State
528 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)