Harper v. State

521 So. 2d 163, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 323, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1988 WL 6592
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 1988·No. No. 87-293·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions of five counts of lewd and lascivious assault under section 800.04(1), Florida Statutes, are affirmed. However, the trial court's written reasons for entering a departure sentence, which include abuse of trust by a teacher, the victims’ psychological trauma, and the inappropriateness of the guidelines sentence, are not clear and convincing. See Laberge v. State, 508 So.2d 416 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla.1987); Hansbrough v. State, 509 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1987); Scott v. State, 508 So.2d 335 (Fla.1987). Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for the imposition of a new sentence within the recommended guidelines range. See Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).

CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. State, 521 So. 2d 163, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 323, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 360, 1988 WL 6592 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

521 So. 2d 163 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
566 So. 2d 823 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Graham v. State
557 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)