Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harper v. State

489 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1322

StatusPublished

This text of 489 So. 2d 882 (Harper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. State, 489 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hereby strike the last noted probation violation on the order of probation revocation because appellant did not plead guilty to that violation. We remand for correction of the scrivener’s error on the order of probation revocation reflecting that appellant received a thirty-year sentence instead of the thirty-month sentence actually imposed. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and LEHAN and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We hereby strike the last noted probation violation on the order of probation revocation because appellant did not plead guilty to that violation. We remand for correction of the scrivener’s error on the order of probation revocation reflecting that appellant received a thirty-year sentence instead of the thirty-month sentence actually imposed. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and LEHAN and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.