Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harper v. State

489 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 532 So. 2d 1091 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1986·No. No. 85-1322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hereby strike the last noted probation violation on the order of probation revocation because appellant did not plead guilty to that violation. We remand for correction of the scrivener’s error on the order of probation revocation reflecting that appellant received a thirty-year sentence instead of the thirty-month sentence actually imposed. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and LEHAN and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We hereby strike the last noted probation violation on the order of probation revocation because appellant did not plead guilty to that violation. We remand for correction of the scrivener’s error on the order of probation revocation reflecting that appellant received a thirty-year sentence instead of the thirty-month sentence actually imposed. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and LEHAN and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Harper v. State, 489 So. 2d 882, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1346, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

489 So. 2d 882 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.