Harmon v. State
47 S.E. 547, 120 Ga. 197, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 499
Opinion
Evidence that the defendant and three others were lying on the ground in a secluded spot with money before them, that each had cards in his hand, and that on being discovered all attempted to escape, was sufficient to sustain a verdict that thS defendant was guilty of playing and betting at a game played with cards for money. Pacetti v. State, 82 Ga. 297 ; Arnold v. State, 117 Ga. 706. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harmon v. State, 47 S.E. 547, 120 Ga. 197, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 499 (Ga. 1904).
47 S.E. 547 (Harmon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodruff v. State
213 S.E.2d 689 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
People v. Camio
165 Misc. 134 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1937)
McFarlin v. State
83 S.E. 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
State v. Souva
137 S.W. 873 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Power v. State
69 S.E. 315 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Griffin v. State
58 S.E. 781 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Davis v. State
51 S.E. 501 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)