Arnold v. State
45 S.E. 59, 117 Ga. 706, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 310
Opinion
In a prosecution for gambling it is sufficient to show that the defendant, with others, played at cards for money, without proof of the character of the game, or which of the players lost or won.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnold v. State, 45 S.E. 59, 117 Ga. 706, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 310 (Ga. 1903).
45 S.E. 59 (Arnold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harmon v. State
47 S.E. 547 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)