Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Power v. State

Power v. State

69 S.E. 315, 8 Ga. App. 408, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 189
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1910
Docket2770
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 315 (Power v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Power v. State, 69 S.E. 315, 8 Ga. App. 408, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 189 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The evidence authorized the conviction, and the ruling is controlled by the decisions in Colbert v. State, supra, Griffin v. State, 2 Ga. App. 534 (58 S. E. 781), and Harman v. State, 120 Ga. 197 (47 S. E. 547).

2, There was no error in overruling the motion for a continuance. The evidence showed that the absent witness was inaccessible, and it was not shown and could not be shown that his attendance was expected at the next term of court.. Howard v. State, 7 Ga. App. 61 (65 S. E. 1076). Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rider v. State
173 S.E.2d 874 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Mims v. State
4 S.E.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Patton v. State
2 S.E.2d 511 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Lewis v. State
195 S.E. 303 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
McFarlin v. State
83 S.E. 795 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Ford v. Superior Court
118 P. 96 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 315, 8 Ga. App. 408, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/power-v-state-gactapp-1910.