Harmon v. Honeywell Intelligrated

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Malissa R. Harmon, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:19cv670 Honeywell Intelligrated, Judge Michael R. Barrett Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 8, 2019 (Doc. 18). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 18) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is DENIED, subject to refiling, if warranted, in response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. In addition, Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 12) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court 1