Harley v. State

984 So. 2d 586, 2008 WL 2276288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 924 So. 2d 831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2008·No. 1D07-1065·Published

Opinion

984 So.2d 586 (2008)

Damion HARLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D07-1065.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2008.
Rehearing Denied June 26, 2008.

Edward T. Bauer of Brooks, LeBoeuf, Bennett, Foster & Gwartney, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

*587 PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence. We note that the appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are cognizable on appeal. It is apparent on the face of the record that defense counsel failed to object to certain comments made by the prosecutor during her rebuttal closing argument. We find, however, no merit to these claims. The appellant has not demonstrated that, but for defense counsel's deficient performance, the results of the proceeding would have been different.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, HAWKES, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harley v. State, 984 So. 2d 586, 2008 WL 2276288 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

984 So. 2d 586 (Harley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.