Harley v. State
This text of 924 So. 2d 831 (Harley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lasundra A. HARLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Laura Griffin, Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellant.
Charles T. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
*832 CANADY, Judge.
Lasundra Harley appeals her conviction for aggravated child abuse after a jury trial, as well as her sixty-two month prison sentence. We affirm her conviction without comment. We affirm Harley's sentence because her claim of vindictive sentence was not preserved for appeal. She did not object or raise the specific issue at sentencing, and she did not file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003) (holding that "failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses [a defendant] from raising the error on direct appeal").
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
924 So. 2d 831, 2005 WL 2656268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harley-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.