Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Garcia v. State

Garcia v. State

920 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2006 WL 348330
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-3755
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 204 (Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. State, 920 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2006 WL 348330 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order summarily denying appellant’s 3.850 motion because the affidavit of the victim could constitute newly discovered evidence which would not be barred by untimeliness.

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hollander v. State
920 So. 2d 204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2006 WL 348330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.