Garcia v. State

867 So. 2d 625, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2852, 2004 WL 433896
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2004·No. No. 2D03-3389·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Harris v. State, 777 So.2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NORTHCUTT, COVINGTON, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State, 867 So. 2d 625, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2852, 2004 WL 433896 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 625 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
874 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)