Garcia v. State

796 So. 2d 647, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15018, 2001 WL 1267054
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 2001·No. No. 3D01-2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the denial of Enrique Garcia’s rule 3.800 motion for post conviction relief as to the habitual violent offender sentences imposed upon him for life felony convictions stemming from offenses committed before October 1, 1995. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992); Omound v. State, 743 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

On remand, Garcia is to be re-sentenced on count three (kidnaping with a weapon) in case number 94-39224A, and count four (kidnaping with a weapon) in case number 94-39225. The balance of the order denying defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm the order in part, reverse in part and remand with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State, 796 So. 2d 647, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15018, 2001 WL 1267054 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

796 So. 2d 647 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. State
847 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)