Omound v. State

743 So. 2d 616, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 1999 WL 936224
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1999·No. No. 99-2199·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief as to the armed burglary conviction. The state concedes that the court improperly imposed an habitual violent felony offender sentence on the life felony count of armed burglary of an occupied dwelling with an assault or battery with a firearm. Defendant committed the crime before October 1, 1995. At that time, the statute did not provide for habitualization of a life felony. See Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992); Klein v. State, 731 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Watkins v. State, 706 So.2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Grant v. State, 677 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence on that count and remand for resentencing only on the armed burglary conviction. The order is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; sentence vacated; and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Omound v. State, 743 So. 2d 616, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 1999 WL 936224 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

743 So. 2d 616 (Omound v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcia v. State
796 So. 2d 647 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Lovett v. State
773 So. 2d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)