Hanna v. Clark
This text of 41 A. 1118 (Hanna v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Substantially the assignments of error in this case raise but one question, and that is the liability of Edward K. Clark as a trustee ex maleficio. This same question is also presented in the sixty-eighth assignment of error in the appeal of Junius R. [338]*338Clark, in this same case, No. 187, January term, 1898, and is there decided, ante, p. 321. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that cause we sustain the eighth assignment of error in this, and reverse the decree of the court below as to Edward K. Clark.
The decree of the court below in all respects except as to so much thereof as relates to Edward K. Clark, and holds him to be a trustee ex maleficio as to the property.,purchased by him from C. R. Early, and requires him to account for the proceeds of that property, is affirmed, and as to so much of the decree as relates to that subject it is hereby reversed and the record is remitted to the court below at the cost of the appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A. 1118, 189 Pa. 337, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hanna-v-clark-pa-1899.