Hankins v. United States

Court of Claims

Hankins v. United States

185 Ct. Cl. 806, 183 Ct. Cl. 32, 1968 WL 4073

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 15, 1968

DocketNo. 20-67

StatusPublished

This text of 185 Ct. Cl. 806 (Hankins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hankins v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 806, 183 Ct. Cl. 32, 1968 WL 4073 (cc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

On March 15, 1968, the court rendered an opinion holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover, the amount of recovery to be determined in further proceedings pursuant to Rule 47 (c). In accordance with the opinion of the court, a stipulation of the parties and a memorandum report of the commissioner, it was ordered on September 19,1968, that judgment be entered to the effect that plaintiff is entitled to recover nothing from defendant in this action because his outside earnings from civilian employment during the period between the effective date of his honorable discharge and the date of the court’s decision were in excess of the pay and allowances he would have received if he had remained on active duty in the Air Force.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On March 15, 1968, the court rendered an opinion holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover, the amount of recovery to be determined in further proceedings pursuant to Rule 47 (c). In accordance with the opinion of the court, a stipulation of the parties and a memorandum report of the commissioner, it was ordered on September 19,1968, that judgment be entered to the effect that plaintiff is entitled to recover nothing from defendant in this action because his outside earnings from civilian employment during the period between the effective date of his honorable discharge and the date of the court’s decision were in excess of the pay and allowances he would have received if he had remained on active duty in the Air Force.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 Ct. Cl. 806, 183 Ct. Cl. 32, 1968 WL 4073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hankins-v-united-states-cc-1968.