Hankerson v. State

864 So. 2d 1228, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 632, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 295
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hankerson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 831 So. 2d 235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2004·No. No. 4D03-4054·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Travis Hankerson (Appellant) appeals from an order summarily denying his motion for additional jail time credit, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. He claimed he was incarcerated on three lower tribunal cases from December 23, 1996, to January 16, 1998, or 380 days, but did not receive full credit. The trial court’s order explained that he was granted credit for the 380 days' in the two 1996 cases, but that he was not arrested in the 1997 case until January 27, 1997. (Documents filed by the state in response to this court’s order to show cause indicate that he received only 360 days credit for time served in the 1997 case.)

The trial court’s order did not attach, and the state’s response has not supplied, any portion of the files and records in this case supporting the trial court’s statement that Appellant was not arrested in the 1997 case until January 27, 1997. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying relief without attaching supporting portions of the record. Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and remanded with directions for the trial court either to refute Appellant’s claims with record attachments or to award the appropriate credit. See, e.g., Collins v. State, 805 So.2d 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

WARNER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hankerson v. State, 864 So. 2d 1228, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 632, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 295 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

864 So. 2d 1228 (Hankerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. State
805 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)