Hankerson v. State
929 So. 2d 691, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 2006 WL 1373236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 22, 2006·No. No. 1D03-4302·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant raises three issues on appeal, none of which have any merit, and only one of which requires brief discussion. Appellant’s retrial for first degree murder and resulting conviction for third degree murder following his earlier conviction as charged for second degree murder which was reversed on grounds other than sufficiency of the evidence, was not barred by principles of double jeopardy. See State v. Lynch, 134 N.M. 139, 74 P.3d 73, 75-77 (2003). Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hankerson v. State, 929 So. 2d 691, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983, 2006 WL 1373236 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
929 So. 2d 691 (Hankerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dempsey v. State
72 So. 3d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)