Hankerson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hankerson v. State

777 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1336, 2001 WL 127665

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hankerson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 831 So. 2d 235 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2001·No. No. 5D00-3666·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for belated appeal, the undisputed factual allegations show that petitioner’s appeal rights were frustrated when the order denying his petition for post-conviction relief was not received until May 16, 2000, leaving petitioner only one day in which to file a timely motion for rehearing to toll the time to appeal. Therefore, we grant the petition for belated appeal and reinstate petitioner’s appeal, Case No. 5D00-1831.

PETITION GRANTED.

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this petition for belated appeal, the undisputed factual allegations show that petitioner’s appeal rights were frustrated when the order denying his petition for post-conviction relief was not received until May 16, 2000, leaving petitioner only one day in which to file a timely motion for rehearing to toll the time to appeal. Therefore, we grant the petition for belated appeal and reinstate petitioner’s appeal, Case No. 5D00-1831.

PETITION GRANTED.

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Hankerson v. State, 777 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1336, 2001 WL 127665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

777 So. 2d 1188 (Hankerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.