Hankerson v. State

765 So. 2d 982, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11330, 2000 WL 1258287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1906·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to correct his sentence arguing that his sentence as a habitual violent offender, imposed for a life felony, is illegal based on the unconstitutionality of Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida. That law amended section 775.084, Florida Statutes. (1993), to include life felonies as crimes for which habitual offender sentences may be imposed. See Summers v. State, 747 So.2d 987, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Prior to that amendment, life felonies were not subject to habitualization. We reverse and remand for reconsideration of the sentence under sentencing laws in effect immediately prior to the 1995 amendments. See Lewis v. State, 764 So.2d 874 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

WARNER, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hankerson v. State, 765 So. 2d 982, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11330, 2000 WL 1258287 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 982 (Hankerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick Hawkins v. State of Florida
195 So. 3d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Al L. Burgess v. State of Florida
182 So. 3d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)