Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.

171 N.E. 889, 254 N.Y. 15, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 999
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 13, 1930·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proceeding was instituted under subdivision 3 of section 773 of the Civil Practice Act. The appellant was a party to that proceeding. An order adjudging a party guilty of a civil contempt in, proceedings supplemental to execution is not a final order. (Matter of Steinman v. Conlon, 208 N. Y. 198.)

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp., 171 N.E. 889, 254 N.Y. 15, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 999 (N.Y. 1930).

171 N.E. 889 (Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg
7 N.E.2d 274 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Fox v. Capital Co.
299 U.S. 105 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Matter of Ace Mail Adver., Inc. v. Newgold
192 N.E. 483 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Elmore Milling Co. v. Burgher
147 Misc. 370 (New York County Courts, 1933)
Langley v. Vengo Corp.
228 A.D. 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)