Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg

New York Court of Appeals

Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg

7 N.E.2d 274, 273 N.Y. 385, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1217

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 23, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.E.2d 274 (Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg, 7 N.E.2d 274, 273 N.Y. 385, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1217 (N.Y. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although this court allowed the appeal in this cause, it has been called to our attention that the *386 order is not appealable. (Matter of Steinman v. Conlon, 208 N. Y. 198; Hand v. Ortschreib Building Corp., 254 N. Y. 15. See Jewelers’ Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers’ Weekly Pub. Co., 155 N. Y. 241.) We, therefore, do not pass on the merits but reserve the question until properly before us for review.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI