Langley v. Vengo Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Langley v. Vengo Corp.

228 A.D. 835

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion to require plaintiff separately to state and number her causes of action and to dismiss complaint as to defendants Naphen & Co., Incorporated, and George F. Naphen, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and [836] disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein upon payment of such costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to require plaintiff separately to state and number her causes of action and to dismiss complaint as to defendants Naphen & Co., Incorporated, and George F. Naphen, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and [836] disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein upon payment of such costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Langley v. Vengo Corp., 228 A.D. 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

228 A.D. 835 (Langley v. Vengo Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related