Hampton v. State
623 So. 2d 606, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906, 1993 WL 331421
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hampton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8046 →
Opinion
We find no merit in either of the arguments presented for reversal of the conviction which is therefore affirmed. However, in view of the admitted uncertainty concern[607]*607ing the proper computation of guidelines points, the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hampton v. State, 623 So. 2d 606, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8906, 1993 WL 331421 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
623 So. 2d 606 (Hampton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.