Hampton v. State

599 So. 2d 1054, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6874, 1992 WL 131831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hampton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 549 So. 2d 1059
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1992·No. No. 91-1994·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Hampton v. State, 596 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), this court instructed appellant on the briefing schedule for this appeal from denial of a rule 3.800(a) post-conviction relief motion. Appellant did not file his initial brief, or respond to a subsequent show cause order.

DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute.

DELL, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hampton v. State, 599 So. 2d 1054, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6874, 1992 WL 131831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 1054 (Hampton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. State
596 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)