Hampton v. State

630 So. 2d 1248, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 617, 1994 WL 27304
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 1994
DocketNo. 92-04015
StatusPublished

This text of 630 So. 2d 1248 (Hampton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hampton v. State, 630 So. 2d 1248, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 617, 1994 WL 27304 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for sale of cocaine, including the finding that appellant is subject to an extended sentence as a habitual offender. See King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992). However, we remand for correction of the order revoking probation, which erroneously states that appellant violated condition (5) relating to the commission of a separate criminal offense. Appellant did not admit to this particular violation, nor was evidence of same received at the violation hearing.

SCHOONOVER, Acting C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
597 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 So. 2d 1248, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 617, 1994 WL 27304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.