Hampton v. State
This text of 630 So. 2d 1248 (Hampton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for sale of cocaine, including the finding that appellant is subject to an extended sentence as a habitual offender. See King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992). However, we remand for correction of the order revoking probation, which erroneously states that appellant violated condition (5) relating to the commission of a separate criminal offense. Appellant did not admit to this particular violation, nor was evidence of same received at the violation hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 So. 2d 1248, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 617, 1994 WL 27304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hampton-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.