Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 554
United States Customs Court·Decided May 15, 1958·No. No. 61937; protest 325085-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise are watch parts, consisting of assemblies or subassemblies made of one piece of metal and one watch jewel, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 554 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 554 (Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.