Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 554
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 15, 1958
DocketNo. 61937; protest 325085-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 554 (Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 554 (cusc 1958).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise are watch parts, consisting of assemblies or subassemblies made of one piece of metal and one watch jewel, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 Cust. Ct. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammel-riglander-co-v-united-states-cusc-1958.