Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 348
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 3, 1957
DocketNo. 61004; protest 283816-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 348 (Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 348 (cusc 1957).
Opinion
[349]*349Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise in question consist of metal screws, made of one piece of metal, and are dedicated for use and exclusively used in watch movements, and that said screws are not jewels, the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammel-riglander-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.