Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 348
United States Customs Court·Decided July 3, 1957·No. No. 61004; protest 283816-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
[349]*349Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise in question consist of metal screws, made of one piece of metal, and are dedicated for use and exclusively used in watch movements, and that said screws are not jewels, the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 348 (cusc 1957).
39 Cust. Ct. 348 (Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.