Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 362
United States Customs Court·Decided July 12, 1957·No. No. 61044; protest 284177-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of unset jewels, suitable for use in any watch movement, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 362 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 362 (Hammel, Riglander & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.