Hall v. State

840 So. 2d 369, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3244, 2003 WL 1088008
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 2003·No. No. 1D02-2915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the briefs, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We therefore affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of the judgment and sentence. Because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 840 So. 2d 369, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3244, 2003 WL 1088008 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

840 So. 2d 369 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
840 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)