Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hall v. State

Hall v. State

752 So. 2d 1245, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2217, 2000 WL 256304
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2960·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. After return of the jury’s verdict, the court recognized that double jeopardy prohibited conviction for both unlawful possession of [1246]*1246a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense and robbery with a firearm. However, the written judgment reflects adjudications of guilt on both counts. As the state properly concedes, the conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm must be vacated.

Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand for correction of the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 752 So. 2d 1245, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2217, 2000 WL 256304 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

752 So. 2d 1245 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
83 So. 3d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Elozar v. State
872 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Merrell v. State
841 So. 2d 677 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)