Hall v. State

689 So. 2d 448, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2505, 1997 WL 121109
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1997·No. No. 96-2045·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm as to the inclusion of victim injury points on appellant’s sentencing score-sheet, as appellant failed to make a contemporaneous objection to their inclusion. State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996). However, in resentencing appellant, the trial court failed to give the appellant credit for all of the time he had spent in prison on his original sentence. See Rivera v. State, 638 So.2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

We therefore remand to correct the sentence to grant appellant credit for all time served since the original sentencing. Appellant is not required to be present when the trial court corrects the sentence.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 689 So. 2d 448, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2505, 1997 WL 121109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

689 So. 2d 448 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newfield v. State
807 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)