Hall v. State

646 So. 2d 856, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 49, 1995 WL 1659
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1995
DocketNo. 93-3793
StatusPublished

This text of 646 So. 2d 856 (Hall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hall v. State, 646 So. 2d 856, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 49, 1995 WL 1659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Hall appeals that aspect of a sentencing order that imposes restitution, explaining that the trial court did not afford him a restitution hearing. Because the state correctly concedes error, we reverse and remand for such further proceedings as may be appropriate.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 So. 2d 856, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 49, 1995 WL 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hall-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.