Hall v. State

659 So. 2d 491, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9259, 1995 WL 516462
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 1995·No. No. 95-1379·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the summary denial of a motion for jail time credit. As the state observes, from the current state of the record, it is unclear whether appellant is entitled to any relief. The appealed order does not state the reason for the denial, and the lower court failed to attach that portion of the record demonstrating appellant is entitled to no relief. We reverse and remand with instructions to the lower court either to attach copies of the pertinent record or, if necessary, to conduct a hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. State, 659 So. 2d 491, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9259, 1995 WL 516462 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 491 (Hall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worthington v. State
667 So. 2d 1023 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Fulton v. State
659 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)