Worthington v. State
This text of 667 So. 2d 1023 (Worthington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Derrick WORTHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Derrick Worthington, Raiford, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
W. SHARP, Judge.
Appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion for jail time credit. The trial court failed to attach portions of the record to the appealed order demonstrating the defendant is entitled to no relief. Hall v. State. 659 So.2d 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The state's attempt to provide such documentation to this court by supplemental record does not cure the defect. Smothers v. State, 555 So.2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Saunders v. State, 661 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Foley v. State, 657 So.2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). We reverse and remand with instructions to the lower court either to attach copies of the pertinent record, or if necessary, to conduct a hearing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
667 So. 2d 1023, 1996 WL 65097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthington-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.