Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Merrell v. State

Merrell v. State

841 So. 2d 677, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4790, 2003 WL 1824686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-0286
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 841 So. 2d 677 (Merrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merrell v. State, 841 So. 2d 677, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4790, 2003 WL 1824686 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence in all respects except his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony in Case No. 89-5491. Appellant correctly argues, as conceded by the state, that his conviction on this count is illegal and must be vacated as violative of the double jeopardy clause where he was also convicted of two counts of armed robbery, two counts of armed kidnaping, and one count of armed burglary in this same case. See Hall v. State, 752 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Affirmed in part. Reversed and remanded with directions in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
109 So. 3d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Elozar v. State
872 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Pope v. State
841 So. 2d 677 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
841 So. 2d 677, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4790, 2003 WL 1824686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merrell-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.