H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co.
This text of 486 P.2d 1071 (H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this cause we granted a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, as reported in 2 Wn. App. 600,468 P.2d 1008 (1970).
Our decision in Murphy v. Campbell Inv. Co., 79 Wn.2d 417, 486 P.2d 1080 (1971), contemporaneously filed, involves and affirmatively resolves the basic question presented in this action, i.e., whether a contractor’s substantial compliance with the registration requirements of RCW 18.27 (the contractors registration act) satisfies the policy of that statute. The essential facts in the instant case, as well as the determination of the Court of Appeals, are in accord with the Murphy case. Disposition of this cause is, therefore, controlled by Murphy.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 P.2d 1071, 79 Wash. 2d 431, 1971 Wash. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/h-o-meyer-drilling-co-v-alton-v-phillips-co-wash-1971.