H. E. Crook Co. v. United States

59 Ct. Cl. 348, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 537, 1924 WL 2353
United States Court of Claims·Decided March 3, 1924·No. No. B-195·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

[350]*350MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

The facts in this case are fully set out in the findings, and it is not necessary to recapitulate them here. The plaintiff commenced work under the contract, and was delayed 412 days by the defendant in its performance. It thereby incurred losses and expenses amounting to the sum of $11,894.07. These facts are not disputed.

The law governing- such cases is well established, and has been repeatedly asserted by this court and by the Supreme Court of the United States. Kelly & Kelly v. United States, 31 C. Cls. 361; William Cramp & Sons v. United States, 41 C. Cls. 164; Muller v. United States, 113 U. S. 153; United States v. Smith, 94 U. S. 214.

Judgment for plaintiff under Finding IV for the sum of $11,849.07.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. E. Crook Co. v. United States, 59 Ct. Cl. 348, 1924 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 537, 1924 WL 2353 (cc 1924).

59 Ct. Cl. 348 (H. E. Crook Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sofarelli Bros. v. Elgin
129 F.2d 785 (Fourth Circuit, 1942)
Hirsch v. United States
94 Ct. Cl. 602 (Court of Claims, 1941)
Sobel v. United States
88 Ct. Cl. 149 (Court of Claims, 1938)
Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United States
85 Ct. Cl. 603 (Court of Claims, 1937)
Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United States
71 Ct. Cl. 739 (Court of Claims, 1931)
Steel Products Engineering Co. v. United States
71 Ct. Cl. 457 (Court of Claims, 1931)
Goldstone v. United States
61 Ct. Cl. 401 (Court of Claims, 1925)