Guntipally v. United States

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case Nos. 16-cr-00189-JSC-1 Plaintiff, 21-cv-03304-JSC 8 v. 9 ORDER DENYING MS. 10 SUNITHA GUNTIPALLY, G M U O N T T IO IP N A F L O L R Y ’ R S E S C U O C N C S E I S D S E IV R E A TION Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 468

12 SUNITHA GUNTIPALLY, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 Defendant. 17

18 Ms. Sunitha Guntipally moves for successive reconsideration of the Court’s denial of her 19 request for a certificate of appealability of a prior order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to 20 vacate, set aside or correct her sentence. (Dkt. No. 468.)1 Following the Ninth Circuit’s decision 21 in United States v. Patnaik, 125 F.4th 1223 (9th Cir. 2025), the Court denied Ms. Guntipally’s 22 motion. (Dkt. No. 467.) Ms. Guntipally does not present new law or facts that support 23 reconsideration, so, for the reasons set forth in the Court’s January 14, 2025 Order, her motion is 24 DENIED. 25 26 1 Record citations are to material in the Electronic Case File (“ECF”) number 16-cr-00189-JSC-1; 27 pinpoint citations are to the ECF-generated page numbers at the top of the documents. Ms. 1 This Order disposes of Docket No. 468 in Case No. 16-cr-00189-JSC-1. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 || Dated: May 22, 2025 4 5 re JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12

© 15 16

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28